close

As advertised a few months back I have created a new website for more of a Free Speech Atmosphere, I will no longer allow FE Theory at WT.Online but will at Truth In The World Dot Com, I will not allow FE here as per the last few months and doubt that I ever will, I Loathe it mainly because of all the infighting it brings and a certain tribe is laughing at us because of it, Meanwhile they are up to the usual tricks while we squabble over something with Zero Relevance, Danke

Up next


13 OF THE BIGGEST LIES PSEUDO SCIENCE WE'VE BEEN TOLD

274 Views
Published on 27 Mar 2022 / In Uncategorized

mirrored from BNT
HerbalGirl channel
https://brandnewtube.com/watch..../13-of-the-biggest-l

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
8 Comments sort Sort By

dude
dude 6 months ago

Really?! Just to get people to watch a 'the earth is flat' video? faggot land.

   0    0
Pɪʀᴀᴛᴇ Pᴇᴛᴇ

Welcome to my blocked list for being disrespectful.

   1    0
JesseJames
JesseJames 6 months ago

Odd tv on jewtube has some good videos on this subject

   1    0
Pɪʀᴀᴛᴇ Pᴇᴛᴇ

Yes I'm mirroring a few of his videos on here. : )

   1    0
dino
dino 6 months ago

This is a little bit weird. I expected Darwinism to be one of the most important lies, but it is not mentioned at all. The dinosaurs also seem like a good candidate for this list, but it is also not mentioned. And then at the end all of a sudden it is claimed that the earth is flat. So in effect, this is just a flat earth video. This flat earth stuff really grinds my gears. I have never ever heard a cogent argument for this assertion. All I ever hear is slogans. This claim is similar to saying that the earth is supported by a giant turtle with four elephants on its back - as is claimed in Hindu mythology. If you say that the earth is flat, what is below us? What is at the edges? Why do we have sunrises and sunsets? Why do we observe a spherical moon? Why do we observe a round sun? Why do we have seasons? Why do we have crescent moons? Etcetera etcetera. But most importantly: what purpose does it serve? Why would the lie of a spherical earth be so vigorously pushed and the truth of a flat earth so vigorously hidden? There is no logic whatsoever to the entire flat earth narrative yet I see so many people in the truth community harping on it. The only thing that is worth investigating is the luciferian numerology that is involved. That numerology consists of three major red flags:
1) the speed of earth's orbit around the sun being 66,600 mph
2) the tilt of the earth's axis being 66.6 degrees
3) the curvature of the earth being such that you drop 0.666 feet over a 1-mile distance

   2    1
dustyfemalecat
dustyfemalecat 6 months ago

They take stuff out of nature like the numbers and other symbols and make it their evil signature as another form of psychologucal warfare on humanity, where something beautiful like an owl or the planet Saturn becomes associated with evil. I live under a very wide open sky and I understand perspective and a flat earth model would never work with the perspective of the sun and the moon and what I see them do. At sunset the bottom of a mountain will be in shadow while the top portion is still illuminated. That can't happen with a flat earth model where the sun would always be higher than any mountain with the rays always angling down. The flat earth psy op is so normies can't be woken up as they will disregard the truth because of the flat earth thing which will look absolutely crazy to them, therefore making everything else look crazy, like we are just crazy conspiracy theorists like msm says.

   2    2
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago

Your comment seems genuine, but i have the feeling that it's just too big for you to believe. Study freemasonry and watch stuff made by Eric Dubay on Bitchute. He's also a National Socialist who knows EVERYTHING we were told is a lie. Welcome to reality brother. When what most sheep call "conspiracy theorists" say that the whole world's a stage. They are 100% right.

   2    1
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago

@dustyfemalecat: You're too mainstream man.. Get out of your brainwashing.. We were played from day one ok. That's it. You gonna have to accept it one day or another. The reason why you are here on this website is because you're looking for the truth, which means you know you've been lied to. The truth is way harder to accept than you can think though, and you will go through some hard times finding out about it. You think i always dreamed about being the "evil nazi" that everyone hates?
That i woke up one morning thinking: "ah, what a nice day. I think i'll destroy my life by finding out information that most people disagree with so i can have the whole world against me" ?
Truth won't make you friends. Rather the opposite. So if you really want the truth. You better be ready to be hated hardcore by many.

   2    1
dino
dino 6 months ago

@nonmasonicteacher: You think I don't know about freemasonry? Give me a break. Look, there is something suspicious about sun worship and the notion of a helio-centric model. That I will admit. But still you have given no cogent argument for flat earth either. You tell me to watch Eric Dubay, which I will probably do sometime, because I've heard some good stuff from this guy, but still no cogent argument. Don't give me a patronizing comment saying that I "sound genuine". It's completely irrelevant whether I sound genuine or not. What is relevant is whether or not I make sense, and whether or not a flat earth model makes sense.

   0    0
Pɪʀᴀᴛᴇ Pᴇᴛᴇ

@dino: Link to a few videos in a couple playlists below...

https://worldtruthvideos.websi....te/watch/eric-dubay-

https://worldtruthvideos.websi....te/watch/21-miles-of

   1    0
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago

@dino: Perfect. That's all i'm asking brother.

   0    0
dino
dino 6 months ago

@nonmasonicteacher: I've just watched the first 4 minutes of Eric Dubay's "200 proofs" video, and it is utter nonsense. One would guess that the best proofs would be listed first, but if the first proofs of this video are his best, then I know enough now. One of his "proofs" is that the horizon appears as a straight line. Wow, really? What an insight! How many miles do you think you can see? And according to the Luciferians, the curvature is only 0.666 feet over 1 mile, so that's 2 feet over 3 miles, or 60 centimeters oer 5 kilometers. Do you really think you can see this dip with your naked eye? I've always considered the story about ships on the open seas not being able to see each other as a good argument. If a ship is 50 kilometers away, you will not see the top 6 meters of a ship. That makes sense. I don't know whether it's true, but I've never heard anyone debunk this claim. It's an easy "myth" to debunk, wouldn't you say? Anyway, those other arguments were about engineers not taking into account the curvature or something. It was all bullshit. Eric Dubay turns out to be a disappointment.
By the way, you mentioned the fact that Dubay was a national socialist and you implied that you were one too. You also said that the flat earth notion was "too big" for me to handle. Let me tell you a lie that is too big for you to handle: the fascists under Mussolini and the Nazis under Hitler were all being financed by Wall Street - just like the Bolsheviks and FDR's New Deal. Now that is a lie that you should investigate. Prepare to have your heart broken.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

So on the one hand, you are saying there is no evidence for a flat earth, and on the other, that the numerological data suggests that the standard narrative is satanic.
You need to rationalize your belief system, because at present, it is clearly incoherent.

   1    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

@HereAmI:

Also, you need to do basic FE 1.01 studies, because anyone who asks "why we have seasons" has clearly never researched the most basic things about the model - and so cannot be taken seriously if he wants to have a debate about these things.

   1    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

@dino:


"....And according to the Luciferians, the curvature is only 0.666 feet over 1 mile, so that's 2 feet over 3 miles...."
You are embarrassing yourself.
You are showing that you do not know even the first thing you are talking about.
The formula for curvature is not arithmetic, as you seem to imagine, but exponential, ie it is 8" per mile SQUARED, so this means at 3 miles, the drop is not "2 feet" as you ignorantly think, but SIX feet, and at 5 miles, almost seventeen feet.
So, stop embarrassing yourself publicly, and go away and do a proper investigation into this subject, and if you then come back, chastened and slightly more credible, then we can have a discussion about what you have discovered.

   0    0
dino
dino 6 months ago

@HereAmI: Ohh wow, you really got me there! How embarrassing! You are so smart for figuring me out!
Too bad that your little expose is completely beside the point.
And still no cogent arguments!

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

@dino:

It really wasn't difficult; even a ten-year-old could have done the same.
You dismiss FE without having done any of the necessary work to understand what we say; your opinions therefore are worthless - as I showed.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

@dustyfemalecat:

Your point about the rays of the sun "always angling down" is absurd.
When the sun is above an object, you are correct.
But when it has gone past that object, its rays no longer angle down, but strike the object from the side, and at an increasingly acute angle, and in increasingly parallel beams.
The evidence is that what you see in relatively humid atmospheric conditions is an optical illusion caused by the sun's rays being refracted; what you see however in dry desert conditions is the sun never going down, but simply getting smaller and receding away from your eyes.
So if the sun never sets but instead gets smaller all the time, this is prima facie evidence for a flat earth and a nearby sun; and from amateur rocket experiments, this distance would seem to be approximately 400,000'.

   0    0
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago (edited)

The growing fetus gets food, if the food is alcohol or cocaine, heroin or thalidomide, the fetus will adapt to this food, it will become crippled, mentally weakened, or not grow arms or legs. If the fetus gets one-sided nutrition, for example ginger because the pregnant woman is addicted to ginger, the later child will also be addicted to ginger and nobody has any idea how the child is to be treated, the "psychologist" is rushed to the poor child who does not care about his meals in the womb and the "psychologist" knows nothing about it either. food is a weapon that kills, or directs evolution in the right direction, so it can make you mentally healthy and physically strong. If the pregnant woman does not take cod liver oil, depending on the geographical zone, certain organs are not properly supplied and the fetus, i.e. the organs, suffers from depression without "knowing" it. The fetus must be provided with the right food at the right time because the type of food is a reminder of the food our ancestors ate and our ancestors were not just humans but all animals that came before us. Life is memory of the evolutionary conditions because without memory, physical memory, there is no life. If the egg couldn't remember that it had to take sperm, a very specific type of sperm, it would die and no new life would be created.

Actually, one can say that all pharmaceutical laboratories are weapons factories. Artificial medicine doesn't know the body, it doesn't know anything about evolution, only evolution knows about itself. Everyone who works in a pharmaceutical factory is someone who probably produces the most dangerous weapons. We are the poison people...

   0    1
SaxonWarrior
SaxonWarrior 6 months ago

Evolution really?! Name one example of macro evolution?! You can't because the THEORY is absolutely ridiculous, we were obviously created we did not evolve, evolution is a childish theory that exists only in the mind of pseudo intellectuals!!

   6    0
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago

@SaxonWarrior: In my comment I already proved evolution by saying that the fetus adapts to the circumstances. The fetus recapitulates evolution in its development, it initially has gills and a tail, clear evidence of its oceanic origin. Embryogenesis is not a fantasy, it is a biological fact that anyone can observe and draw logical conclusions from. The amniotic fluid is salty, I think even with the same salt content if I'm not mistaken, also a proof of the origin of man from the ocean. Evolution is the explanation of how something developed. When we see gills in the fetus we have to assume that they are useful and that they reflect the recapitulation of the early development of the mammalian human being. The butterfly, in its various stages, recapitulates its ancestors, each of which was a separate creature in these various stages, but for the time being this is just my own explanation of the different stages of the butterfly. It looks like evolution is not a fantasy but is reflected in the stages of development of living beings...

   0    1
Kevmol
Kevmol 6 months ago

@SaxonWarrior: She claims God doesn't exist and is only a distraction.. so it's hard to take the comments seriously, no matter how many words she uses(it's very much like the BBC/History Channel line of dialog). I agree with you 100%.. There are NO examples, macro or micro! she is only pointing out a few correlations and saying they are proofs. The non existant fosil record is enough for anyone to see the truth!! Darwin and Huxley decided to interbreed their families and that was what brought us the "beautiful" mind that was Aldus and his vision of a brave new world!!

   2    0
WhiteMiasma
WhiteMiasma 6 months ago

@ytrebiLeurT: @ytrebiLeurT: Antogenus recapitulation phylogeny (not spelled right) is what you are talking about, where the man in the womb is alleged to undergo a type of reenacting of all the forms his long past progenitors took. However - this is in no way at all a simple feat and - according to the theory of evilution, if it were to not take place exactly like this, then the person would die. What would cause this death? With evilution, any and every feature must enable a form to live were all the others must die; otherwise the alleged changes get swallowed right back into the gene-pool when the things breed.

Ernst Hakel a (((JEW!!!))), LIED, and drew pictures of embryos of people and animals and made them all look alike on purpose - HE LIED LIKE A JEW. He was caught and punished by his own university. He was caught and his lie discovered about this in the 1850-70s (I think), over 150 years ago and this jew's drawings are STILL IN BOOKS PRINTED WITH TAX MONEY AND PUT IN SCHOOL CHILDREN'S HANDS. These 'gill slits" are not. They are the beginnings of the throat and bones in the ears and face.

Friend, I hope my typings here does not sound heavy toward you; shame we can't talk as this carries no tone.

Kent Hovind has the best and clearest information on this. I understand this video is quite long, but it is the first place I found him. Great video. Great man. And you can call his cellphone and he does pick it up 885BIGDINO; Trump and Biden can't be bothered - nor can any officials. I have called him a few times when I didn't know what to do and he gave me great advise.
https://www.bing.com/videos/se....arch?q=kent+hovind+3

   1    0
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago

@WhiteMiasma: I always think it's good when doubts are raised and I follow up on your doubts as best I can. I will investigate and thank you very much for your sincerity, we will make things right. Words like "lie" won't get us anywhere, I want to know...

   1    0
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago

@WhiteMiasma: Evolution is proven, organisms evolve from other organisms by adapting to changing circumstances, changing conditions evolving changing organisms because biology is malleable, I have no doubt and all life originated in salty water. Sorry, no "creator"...


"All vertebrates develop gill arches during embryonic development. However, these have undergone a change in their function and should therefore better be called pharyngeal arches.
Usually, a pharyngeal arch apparatus consists of the pharyngeal arches, pharyngeal sulci, pharyngeal pouches, and pharyngeal arch membranes. The pharyngeal arch itself consists of a branchial arch artery, a cartilage clip, a muscle element and a branchial arch nerve. Their nucleus is of mesodermal origin. They are covered on the outside by ectodermal tissue and on the inside by endodermal (pharyngeal pockets).
Among other things, the lower jaw and the chewing muscles develop from the pharyngeal arches.


The gill arches, also called branchial arches (Arcus branchiales), pharyngeal arches, pharyngeal arches or visceral arches (Southern German usually uses 'arches' as the plural form) are formations of the gills in vertebrates. The process of formation is called branchiomerism. Six such arches form in the mammalian embryo, with the fifth and sixth usually being only rudimentary.

Typical of the gill arches is their metameric structure, that is, each gill arch is structurally constituted in the same way. Each branchial arch has a core of mesoderm, from which later a cartilage and muscle anlage emerges, a branchial arch nerve from the neural crest and a branchial arch artery. However, the serial or metameric arrangement of the branchial arch nerves has nothing in common with the segmental arrangement of the spinal nerves. The head and trunk regions are organized differently, in other words, the branchiomerism of the gill arches and the metamerism of the body wall are to be regarded as independent of one another.

In fish, the membranes between the furrow and the pocket tear and the definitive gills develop. The existence of such gill arches and furrows in embryos of higher vertebrates was first described by Martin Rathke."

   0    0
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago

@WhiteMiasma: "Rathke discovered the gill arches in mammalian and bird embryos. In comparative studies of gill development, he found a protuberance in the roof of the developing oral cavity. This formation, now known as the Rathke pouch, is the starting point for the development of the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland. Rathke is also considered one of the fathers of marine zoology. He discovered the lancelet as a separate species and dealt with crustaceans and molluscs."

   0    0
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago (edited)

@Kevmol: God didn't create us though. The devil did, and this world is it's creation as well. The good god that we all believe we pray to which should be the true good god above all creators who is not the creating force of those creators of evil that have been created by something else. Is actually the devil. It's not because they call it "god" that it's not a trick of the devil to make you worship it.
I pray the true good god who wants us to be saved. I know he has no power in this world, but i beg him every day to pierce through the walls of heaven and to extend his hand.
Only he has love and compassion. Non of our creators care about us. Actually they have profound disgust for us. Don't you ever go and believe a good god would create this hell we live in with all the bs laws of nature we have to deal with. If you accept nature as it is just because. Then, you're not a National Socialist. The only true god of the physical realm is Adolf Hitler, and no one else.

   0    2
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago

@ytrebiLeurT: You're on the wrong website if you believe all that crap. Or you're a subverting mason.

   0    1
ytrebiLeurT
ytrebiLeurT 6 months ago

@nonmasonicteacher: I cannot ignore biological facts...

   0    1
TSOSWBEX77
TSOSWBEX77 6 months ago

Everyone is waking up to their lies , at the same time the FAJ / SOS / GOGs power and global control is virtually complete.

The awakening is in full swing ; soon there will be a Final Conflict , between the forces of good and the forces of evil .

The scriptures clearly tell us who the winners will be : ""WHITE ADAMIC ISRAELITE RACE""

   3    0
nonmasonicteacher
nonmasonicteacher 6 months ago

Your "scriptures" you fcking nutcase, are the first forms of predictive programing written by kike joo masons who now got you by the balls you fcking optimist! We're screwed period! Wake the fck up!
I see you from here with your hands tied around a poll behind your back with a bag over your head aligned on a wall with many others saying "jesus will come and save us".
Your "scriptures" were written so that you don't do anything and just sit on your ass waiting for the messiah. Taking absolutely all power away from you and putting it into the hands of a false god.
The only true god of the physical realm is Adolf Hitler, and the only other god that can save us, is another god like him, A MAN! Study freemasonry a little bit please.

   0    2
HereAmI
HereAmI 6 months ago

@nonmasonicteacher:

The scriptures are certainly predictive; and that tells us that they are divinely inspired and written.
They also predict the terrible fate of the jews you mention, so again clearly, they are not written by jews, whom God hates, and whom God will destroy.
Because you lack the spirit of God, you are tied with your hands behind a pole to this present world; we however have overcome death through the sacrifice of our beloved Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and so even in death we rejoice, whereas you mourn.
And we do do something; we obey the Commandments, which is what we are commanded to do.
We are not commanded to kill, or to resist evil, but to overcome evil with good.
You can never understand these things, because you are constrained by earthly affairs, and so you will return to the earth from which you were taken, and will be remembered no more, whereas we will go on into eternity, in the presence of the One Who loved us, and gave Himself for us, that our joy might be full.
Even in this world, we have something you can only dream of, ie absolute certainty and faith, and joy inexpressible.

   0    0
Show more

Up next