Please help with donations as much as possible Volk
The prices to keep us running have sky rocketed in the last few months.
Danke
MIC Targeted Individual
Delinfielkar
wiking
Balkanfight3r
Louis Marschalko
Harry Knowledge123
GottMitUns1986
DavilleKy
How did the WTC-7 collapse?
Dr. William Luther Pierce on the 9/11 Attacks: www.bitchute.com/video/2leOOiy0BBCw/
9/11 Attack Motives | DenierBud, William Pierce, Bobby Fischer, David Duke, Mark Weber: www.bitchute.com/video/YpXoFVhvosbs/
Dr. Greg Johnson on Alex Jones and 9/11: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Tv7h8LCwjC19/
Debunking the Most Desperate and Absurd Truther Lies about 9/11 | Audio Article: www.bitchute.com/video/n5mUCoVXVVOo/
Kevin MacDonald, John Mearsheimer, Norman Finkelstein and Michael Scheuer on the Motives Behind 9/11: www.bitchute.com/video/fdGktHJdAvFP/
John Mearsheimer (Author of 'The Israel Lobby') on the 9/11 Attacks and the Hatred towards the US: www.bitchute.com/video/X4rWPzsPStWC/
Sad History of the 9/11 Attacks: www.bitchute.com/video/hs4NuOJyMSdw/
David Duke on the 9/11 Attacks: www.bitchute.com/video/L1SBP1TejeyK/
Debunking: Larry Silverstein WTC-7 "Pull it" Misconception: www.bitchute.com/video/Op0MF1yhh2aC/
***
DenierBud on 9/11:
"You have to know when to stop. It's disappointing to me that so many revisionists are 9-11 conspiracy theorists."
"9-11 sent me in the direction of holocaust denial. When 9-11 happened I believed it was a response to unfair US foreign policy in the Mideast. Particularly toward the Palestinians. And in those Bin Laden videos released shortly after 9-11, Bin Laden said as much. Bin Laden mentioned Jenin [a Palestinian city that has suffered much because of Israel's military operations]. So I thought 'wow, the media is spinning this in a totally different direction.' The 'they hate our freedom' direction. All this put me on the path to holocaust denial."
https://hooverhog.typepad.com/....hognotes/2008/09/int
9/11 Attack Motives | DenierBud, William Pierce, Bobby Fischer, David Duke, Mark Weber: www.bitchute.com/video/YpXoFVhvosbs/
***
An Excellent article on 9/11: https://www.cancelthiscompany.com/911-lies.html
For starters, the only thing that matters is what the word "pull" meant to Larry Silverstein. A spokesperson for Silverstein later said that he meant withdraw firefighters. And for what it's worth, according to at least 11 demolition companies surveyed, "pull it" is not a term that they use to describe "demolishing a building". Furthermore, fire departments are in the business of fighting fires -- Not demolishing buildings!
And lo and behold, NY Deputy Fire Chief Peter Hayden used the same P-word to describe moving people out to safety when asked about WTC7 in an interview with Firehouse Magazine:
“...we started PULLING the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to PULL guys back because we were concerned for their safety" -- Deputy Chief Peter Hayden of the New York Fire Department
But just for fun, let's assume for a moment that when Larry said "pull" he meant "trigger the explosives". Why on earth would he openly admit to insurance fraud in a TV interview? It makes absolutely no sense. And better yet, why hasn't the insurance company that paid out on the claim investigated this? Obviously even they don't believe in controlled demolition fairy tales.
Even more ridiculous is that in believing that Larry meant "trigger the explosives" you must also believe that the New York City Fire Department conspired with Larry Silverstein to commit insurance fraud by demolishing World Trade Center 7!
Furthermore, Larry Silverstein is already worth 3.5 billion. Why would a billionaire risk going to prison for insurance fraud, for potentially accidentally killing hundreds or thousands of people with high explosives in order to hopefully save money when he's already mega-wealthy?
Dream Theater release 'Live Scenes from New York' on 9/11/2001 with THIS cover:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....Live_Scenes_from_New
Just a coincidence, right? You're a disgusting shill.
The BBC reports bldg 7 collapse BEFORE it happens!
https://worldtruthvideos.websi....te/watch/bbc-reports
The media makes mistakes all the time. They are often guilty of being hasty. The Chicago Tribune famously printed the false headline Defeats Truman. TV news rooms are notoriously chaotic when it comes to reporting the news as events unfold live. Yet somehow truthers surmised that when the BBC reported on the collapse of WTC7 twenty minutes before it happened, that this was the smoking gun. They declared that BBC must have been given advance knowledge of an evil plot to demolish the building.
Once again truthers never thought this one out.
First of all, a logical person has to wonder why would you give a news organization, let alone a foreign news organization advance knowledge of a nefarious act? Why not just let them report it as it happens?
It had already been reported that WTC7 was on fire, it was bulging and making creaking noises, and that fire crews had been pulled out of the area for their safety. It is easy to see how the story got twisted around. Somehow somebody mistook "about to collapse" as "has collapsed".
Furthermore, for someone to believe this conspiracy you must also have an even larger web of conspirators. In addition to a mysterious crew of demolition conspirators slipping past security with wires and explosives rigging the building for weeks and without being noticed by tenants, plus Larry Silverstein, plus NY Fire Department conspirators, plus an insurance company looking the other way, you would also have to have secretive play-by-play communication between the NY fire department and a mysterious government control center conspirator who in turn contacts a producer conspirator at the British TV network. It's more ridiculous than anything Hollywood could produce.
When conspiracy theorist's best evidence of controlled demolition is a false news report, they have reached the point of futility.
@Revision: You keep telling yourself that and brainwashing the normies. There's a HUGE difference between on fire and collapsed. She CLEARLY stated the collapse as fact; there was no confusion. All you have is the unoriginal, vapid "conspiracy theorist" label; you're as creative as buttered toast. The MSM, bought and paid for by the globalist banking psychopaths, have been fake news since Walter Duranty covered for Commie atrocities 100 years ago. Go hump someone else's leg, shill.
What a crock of sh*t! Bldg 7 was an obvious controlled demolition from the way it fell. The claim that it caught fire from the WTC is fanciful. The WTCs themselves collapsed into DUST at freefall speed. Countless engineers are on record to this would've been IMPOSSIBLE unless the lower section was compromised. You embarrass yourself.
DenierBud on 9/11:
"You have to know when to stop. It's disappointing to me that so many revisionists are 9-11 conspiracy theorists."
"9-11 sent me in the direction of holocaust denial. When 9-11 happened I believed it was a response to unfair US foreign policy in the Mideast. Particularly toward the Palestinians. And in those Bin Laden videos released shortly after 9-11, Bin Laden said as much. Bin Laden mentioned Jenin [a Palestinian city that has suffered much because of Israel's military operations]. So I thought 'wow, the media is spinning this in a totally different direction.' The 'they hate our freedom' direction. All this put me on the path to holocaust denial."
https://hooverhog.typepad.com/........hognotes/2008/09
9/11 Attack Motives | DenierBud, William Pierce, Bobby Fischer, David Duke, Mark Weber: www.bitchute.com/video/YpXoFVhvosbs/