close

We got shoah'd but we're back! Thanks for your loyal support. Keep up to date with everything over on our social site WTMX

IRREFUTABLE - Minimal Rubble on 9-11 - Proving No Demolition

170 Views
Messenger Charles
149
Published on 03 Jul 2021 / In 911

The mystery of the vanishing buildings and ALL their contents.

Show more
1 Comments sort Sort By

bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 29 days ago

there was clearly a demolition. just a different kind of demolition than what we are used to.

   6    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

Only partly true. The biggest part of a demolition is the disposing of the collapsed building(s) after the explosive detonations have done their work. Hardly necessary in this event as compared to what it would have been like had it been a real demolition with the resulting multi-millions of tons of debris.

You need a new word to describe what happened just like Dr. Wood created the word 'dustification' to describe the de-atomising process that took place.

   5    1
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: still demolition -albeit obviously via some advanced explosive

   2    1
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: You're obviously as stupid as you are blind. The seismic record for the day PROVES that no explosives were used.

   4    2
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: You believe what you see on t.v. then do you -oh, ok; you go! yey!
What did you actually do personally in the flesh at ground zero -collecting and analysing?
Stop being a pretentious literalist fuck. You know know dick -all you do is regurgitate information that you took for truth.
You're talking through your arse while wallowing in semantics.
Perhaps there is something that can't be identified with something -something that someone has not told you about.
You're the one with the closed mind, motherfucker.

   1    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: The semantics are ALL YOURS, DICK HEAD!

IN ADDITION to what I have said above about debris, this event was NOT a controlled demolition, as previously KNOWN and demonstrated by ALL PREVIOUS CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS USING STRATEGICALLY PLACED EXPLOSIVE CHARGES in order to bring the building down.

A demolition MUST have a substantial seismic record and NONE of any significance was recorded for 9/11

"The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition." - Dr. Judy Wood.

You dissembling morons use the word 'demolition' in order to lead people astray and away from DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS used on 9/11. You're probably a scum bag troll.

   4    1
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: Why the capital letters? -you contemptible control-freak fucktard.
I never mentioned 'controlled demo' or 'strategically placed explosives'.
Your mom is a scum bag troll. . . .by the way, she said hi. . . .at least I think that's what she said -couldn't quite tell, what with my cock in her mouth and all :)
Demolition is the act of destroying something.
Fuckin smug retard.

   3    0
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: "only partly true" my ass.
Like the first guy said: "just a different kind of demolition than what we are used to"
EXACTLY, you sanctimonious pretentious pedant.

   0    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: "Why the capital letters?"

The ALL CAPS are/were an attempt to get through to that useless lump of fat that keeps your ears apart - looks like they didn't work, and for obvious reasons.

"you contemptible control-freak fucktard. I never mentioned 'controlled demo' or 'strategically placed explosives'."

You never mentioned them because you're a dissembling troll or just plain ignorant. ALL DEMOLITIONS ARE CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS and the explosive charges ARE STRATEGICALLY PLACED to bring the building down in its own footprint or as near to it as possible.

"Only partly true" was a correct summation. IT WAS NOT A DEMOLITION AS IN THE USUAL DEFINITION OF DEMOLITIONS, WHICH I HAVE PROVEN. NO EXPLOSIVES WERE USED TO BRING THE BUILDINGS DOWN - PERIOD - FULL STOP - END OF.

In EVERY PREVIOUS DEMOLITION, EXPLOSIVES WERE/ARE ALWAYS USED.

Now we get on to why its important that this event IS NOT CALLED A DEMOLITION by ignorant morons such as you. NEARLY ALL THE DISSO 9/11 so-called TRUTHERS DENY THE USE OF DIRECT ENERGY WEAPONS and stick to their BS nukes shit and explosives to explain their "DEMOLITION!" NOW YOU KNOW WHY IT WAS NOT A TRUE DEMOLITION!

   1    0
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: Like I said, you dumb, cunting, literalist, sanctimonious, conceited, pretentious pedant fucktard.
You're just a tedious egotist control-freak.
Now go fuck your mom and quit wasting my time.

   0    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: "Like I said, you dumb, cunting, literalist, sanctimonious, conceited, pretentious pedant fucktard."

Nothing to do with it, it is what it is - your trouble is that you cannot get your thick head around it = YOUR stiff necked PROBLEM not mine and your silly emotional protests are futile.

Oh and the ego is all yours in your failure to admit that you're wrong. Now you run along and stop being lazy and go get yourself an education re 9/11.

   1    0
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: control-freak

   0    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: I control nothing and no one.

   1    0
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: you definitely don't control your ego

   0    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: Then your interpretation of ego is obviously perverted - again no surprises there then. Anyone who accuses someone of spelling out Truth and facts as egotistic does not understand the word 'ego'.

In contrast it is you that is egotistic in hopelessly attempting to defend your errors. In truth, ego is all that you have in your armoury, for your erroneous argument is defeated.

   1    0
devnly
devnly 29 days ago

@MessengerCharles: You're delusional.
This is how you debate (as opposed to with facts, decorum, and respect): " You're obviously as stupid as you are blind."
Youre the one blinded by hubristic vanity.

   0    0
Messenger Charles
Messenger Charles 29 days ago

@devnly: I am only interested in The Truth and anyone who argues against it, once it is demonstrated to them in a very clear and precise video can only be described as either blind or stupid: the cap fits so wear it sunshine.

   1    0
Show more