close

Try our free social site WTMX

Up next


⁣New Widow Speaks Out About Mandates & Loss of her Husband After the Shot

41 Views
Melissa Lev
226
Published on 11 Sep 2021 / In Phamajewdicals Vaccines
Show more
7 Comments sort Sort By

Stop5G
Stop5G 5 days ago

If you are not Anti-Illuminati Science, Anti-Illuminati Vaccines, Anti-Illuminati Medical Industry, Anti-Illuminati Government, Anti-Illuminati Christianity then you just haven't done your research. Too Marxist Public School / JewTV / Christianity stupid to even know how to do the research. On the bright side woman, "I just don't understand why people just don't give up their arms," is already dead. Maybe, walking dead, but dead nonetheless & just like a Christian, I'm not speaking brain dead. I mean dead, dead.

   1    0
1933HWR1945
1933HWR1945 18 days ago

No need to be concerned about any Jews being killed by the vaccines. They all got placebos.

   1    0
Stop5G
Stop5G 18 days ago

Ah, that's too bad. I heard sex between the vaccinated & the unvaccinated is a once-in-a-lifetime thrill. Vaccines have been about one thing & one thing only. Eugenics.
https://worldtruthvideos.websi....te/watch/vaxxed-from

   1    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 18 days ago

"I'm not an antivaxxer". So she IS for people rolling the dice with this experimental death jab anyway? She acts as though she is ashamed of being labelled anti-vaxxer even after she watched the injection kill her husband! What does it take for these clueless drones to realize the true horror of the situation? The jab is killing more people than the imaginary terror bug she is willing to sacrifice for while the human immune system is capable of holding it's own 99.9 percent of the time for the majority. If the C-viruses are real, allowing natural herd immunity is better than forcing the world to be violated with a deadly and unnecessary drug created by an evil eugenicist who has also publicly promoted the need for mass population reduction.

   3    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 18 days ago

Maybe it's like we are all asleep, and then gradually wake up to the reality of the situation.
The mass hypnosis we are subjected to from birth is not something you wake up from in a sort of "I'll count to ten and then you're fully awake" sort of fashion; it is gradual - but remorseless, of course, once you start to wake up.
But it happens piecemeal; bit by bit.
All this woman needs is somebody like you to sit her down and re-programme her as to what is really going on, and probably she would understand what you were saying immediately - as they say, the scales would fall from her eyes.
But it's an interesting question.

   1    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 17 days ago

@HereAmI: She has certainly left whatever media bubble she was in before and is nowadays full of questions and looking up information on alternative websites that reveal the true carnage of the plandemic. On the other hand, she could be a crisis actress saying "look at poor me - I've lost my husband but you should still get the jab because the sacrifice is worth the risk". It's like war propaganda getting people to accept casualties in the fight against an invisible enemy. How anyone could support the jab after it kills or cripples loved ones is loony tunes to me. If you don't know anybody that's died of the boogie-virus but you are noticing vaxx casualties then it should be clear what the truth is.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 17 days ago

@Spectralwulf:

Is she suggesting that people still get the jab?
Not as I recall.
She was openly ridiculing that woman who stood with her hands on her hips saying that.

   0    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 17 days ago

@HereAmI: She also stated "I am not anti-vaxx - I'm not an anti-vaxx person". She either has cognitive dissonance and is still not wanting to be labelled "one of those people" or she is a liar. If the vaxx kills someone you love for a virus they could have gotten over in a few days, a sane person would say to all others "DO NOT TAKE" - period.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 17 days ago

@Spectralwulf:

As you know, the shot her husband died from was not a "vaxx."
When she referred to the vaxx, she was obviously referring to the ones people used to take, before mRNA tech appeared.
But I think this cognitive dissonance she is suffering from could be overturned by somebody like you dissecting the situation for her - she has clearly been deeply affected by what has happened, and as the Chinese write their word "Danger" as "Opportunity", then this would be your chance to strike while the iron is hot, and completely reassemble her cognition towards truth and common sense.

   0    0
HereAmI
HereAmI 17 days ago

@HereAmI:

But she is implicitly saying "Do not take", - or at the very least, "If you take it, there may well be extreme consequences", so she is definitely there for the taking at this point.

   0    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 17 days ago

@HereAmI: She made it clear she was talking about THE Vaxx. All she demanded was that people not judge those that fear the jab - she never said anything like "don't take it if you know what's good for you". She still must have faith in the Big Pharma murderers who are making bank by killing and crippling multitudes while protected with legal immunity.

   0    0
NewWorldCircus
NewWorldCircus 18 days ago

Very sad

   1    0
Show more

Up next