close

As advertised a few months back I have created a new website for more of a Free Speech Atmosphere, I will no longer allow FE Theory at WT.Online but will at Truth In The World Dot Com, I will not allow FE here as per the last few months and doubt that I ever will, I Loathe it mainly because of all the infighting it brings and a certain tribe is laughing at us because of it, Meanwhile they are up to the usual tricks while we squabble over something with Zero Relevance, Danke

Up next


Niccolo Machiavelli is A Jew That Thinks We Are All Mongrels

103 Views
bannedforhatespeech
206
Published on 10 Jan 2022 / In Jewish Question

in a video he posted demanding christians be cucks that let everyone walk all over them and at the same time attacking Gen. Nathan Bedford Forrest, he said in his comment section that all whites have 5-10% jew blood and have mixed with other races at some point. I'm here to warn you about this kike.

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
2 Comments sort Sort By

Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 9 months ago

Nathan is a censorship-loving prick who will not tolerate disagreement and has a large block list of regulars on WTV. He creates suspicion and division among everyone here and instead of focusing on posting good material to the site, he often posts videos calling everyone he disagrees with a shill and a Jew. Niccolo has proven a reasonable person though he should now resist getting involved with anymore drama concerning NBF and his nefarious activities. This is my new, updated block list as of today.

   5    1
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

this isn't about Nathan. Niccolo literally supports race mixing and thinks we're all mongrels. he is not a white nationalist.

   3    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 9 months ago

@bannedforhatespeech: You didn't show any evidence that he supports race mixing just by saying many white bloodlines are diluted these days. Ancestry tests often prove that to be the case for many people. Americans with frontier ancestors often took Indian squaws for a wife when there were no white women around and black mongrelization can disappear and hide in the DNA after just a few generations.

   1    2
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 9 months ago

@Spectralwulf: Actually, these mixed marriages you speak of were illegal in America until at least 1960. Any mixed kids born would have been a bastard. There were white native tribes, with European DNA. One has to consider that in some of the stories. The Mandan tribe is a prime example; I'm not discounting the minority who might have found themselves in a tribe, hence married to a native. But out on the frontier alone, they were more likely to be killed than to find a wife. They would have been LIS, which was still frowned upon even in the 80's. Sure, there are some, but it's not as prolific yet as they would have you believe. Even in the 90's, the black girls would throw glass bottles at anybody dating one of their men, so this problem is fairly recent.

   3    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 9 months ago

@pastprovespresent: Most race mixing did occur in recent times but every time it happened in the past, that DNA was passed into the population. Most black slaves were once low-IQ like Africans but they clearly got infused with white DNA that raised their average IQs to 85, so there must have been a lot of illegal relations going on that didn't get prosecuted.

   1    1
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 9 months ago

@Spectralwulf: First of all, there are different classes of society. Even if a low class and low education did have an illustrious affair that lead to an offspring, the offspring was not accepted into polite society to be mixed into the general gene pool. I don't know about where you were raised, but most people i know have family trees and know darn well their ancestors.

Second, most of the blacks who have been mixed came from breeding farms during the Barbary slave trade where whites were kidnapped off the coast of Europe, taken to places such as Brazil and the Carribean. You wouldn't know it be looking today, but it existed in Haiti, however, the pure blacks, after slaughtering all the whites, then genocided the mulatos. I've seen their hatred of the mulators in America too. There were a couple of these breedig farms in the US. A black from Angola ran one in the Carolinas. Irish slaves were essentially raped to get what you see today. It was not so much a product of a voluntary action. It was mostly Jews who were engaged in this. Like I said, marriage would have been illegal. Any black guy going for anyone's daughter would have been hung a criminal. Therefore, this didn't happen in open society. Here, I have mentioned tow separate things, the breeding farms where your mixing happened, and what happened in free society. Don't confuse the two. Even today, you will find most mulatos tend to date other mulatos, because the blacks don't really accept them. They were their own race by the point slavery ended. I don't know where you live, but there really weren't so many. In recent times, you have problems with third world immigration, which may make you think that the misgeniation was more prolific than it was. I promise growing up, even in the South, there weren't so many.

Because of the class system, that exists, it is not generally passed into even middle class, let along upper middle and upper. Therefore, even if you had a son who did better than you and moved up to upper middle, it was usually okay. People tended to have family trees and did ask your lineage. Quoting from a lecture, this mixing has and is confined to about 5% of the lower class. Turn off your TV, because they make it seem like it's on every corner. However, most 20 somethings I have talked to want to be with their own kind, including the non-whites. That's nature.

As for your theory of out west, because it was so dangerous, groups of families usually went together. They were called wagon trains;

   2    0
Spectralwulf
Spectralwulf 9 months ago

@pastprovespresent: There was no way they could vigilantly enforce the old miscegenation laws in places where blacks made up a large percentage of the population. Sure race mixing was generally avoided but it clearly did happen. All the educated blacks from history were mulattos. As for your last point, I was referring to buckskinned frontiersmen, trappers and miners who didn't see many white women in the wilderness and could buy a squaw for a horse, a rifle or jugs of whiskey - not the religious pilgrims in covered wagons that came later.

   1    1
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 8 months ago

@Spectralwulf: Where blacks made up a large percentage, there were only blacks to date. I repate: It was against the law. Maybe you forget segregation laws. Even during WWII, among men, black troops were kept separate. If they kept black men separate from white men, how far away do you think they kept the women? Very far! I can cite examples as late as 2000's from other races. A Chinese who dared to date a black, his mother made hell on earth rain until it ended. A black girl (at uni) was with a white, and the mother of the white guy pushed white girls in the son's face. She did everything to break them up and won in the end. Those are two real life examples in the last 20 years even when it was legal. Now, how on earth do you imagine it went when it was illegal? As I said, hung and removed from polite society. Sure, they might be allowed to work a job, but not marry. It was inconceivable! A girl or guy who thought otherwise was disowned and would be thrown out of society. Even when I lived in LA, the Muslims didn't even mix. They lost everything if they even dared to pick a non-muslim wife. The women gathered every Tuesday night to pick a bride for their sons from the old country. Like I said, even in private conversations I have had with other races, sure, they might sleep with a girl if the situation presented itself, but for marriage, they want one of their own.

I will repeat a scholar on this issue from around 2000 who said, "Race mixing has existed, but tends to confine itself to the lower class and only then about 5% of the population." The fact that Hollyweird props up some mixed couples, they are mostly Jews and came from lower classes. These are not even the artists that Royalty would consign to paint portraits.

   0    0
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 8 months ago

@Spectralwulf: Frontiers men: Back then, everybody went out hunting. They came back home to their families. You are projecting modern times onto the past. A frontier man would have often been employed by a company. He would have written home often. He would have either, much like a man in the military, had family back hom and returned after a tour or had his family on the frontier, if he was really a frontier man. As I said, they went out in wagon trains. No man was that desperate, as his family would have shot him on site if tried to bring home a sqaw. Moreover, the Indians would have scalped him if he tried to take one of their women. It's only today that some fools think that there was some sort of tolerance for this.

   0    1
Titanomachy
Titanomachy 8 months ago

@pastprovespresent: Haha Injuns didn't give a fuck once they got their fire water, they would gladly trade a squaw to a trapper for some whiskey. Fur trapping in the 16th and 17th centuries in Canada is an entirely different time and place from the wagon trails that went out to California in the 19th century. A lot of them didn't have wives and there were cases of White men going to live with Injun tribes voluntarily, preferring the wild outdoors to city life I suppose, and the tribe may or may not grant him a wife. The Injuns aren't all that ethnocentric on the whole, most of them had far deeper hatred for rival tribes which they had fought for centuries than they had for the White man, who was kind of a novelty to them, not that they didn't kill a bunch of us but it was essentially war after all. As far as mulattoes go, I don't see where part-White historical figures like Booker T. Washington or Martin Luther King Jr. would fit into the notion that miscegenation didn't happen because it was illegal. Slave owners sometimes dipped into some sheboon strange, it's just something that happened sometimes. It's not as if everyone would automatically know they're not 100% black, when a fully black person mates with a White the outcome looks pretty much fully black as well, what we think of as "mulatto" is probably closer to like 1/3 black or something because most African Americans have at least some White blood, hence the difference in IQ between them and pure sub-Saharan Africans. The forced hybridization of Irish and black slaves contributed some too but it doesn't account for all the miscegenation that took place before the 21st century in North America. Hybridization between Homo sapiens and Homo erectus even occurred for an extended period in the prehistoric past, so...yeah niggers are part Homo erectus. Some people from every race will have sex with anything that moves, I mean if people for time immemorial have been fucking sheep and goats and donkeys, I see no reason to put miscegenation beyond people from eras gone by. It was taboo, sure, but not every crime gets discovered, and not every case goes to trial, and not every trial leads to a conviction.

   1    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

here is the conversation we had earlier.

   3    1
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

conversation continued

   3    1
Niccolo Machiavelli
Niccolo Machiavelli 9 months ago

Most is NOT the same as all, a fact that destroys your entire premise. I think it is hilarious you got your pussy hurt over Nathan. You deserve each other.

https://worldtruthvideos.websi....te/watch/t9FCEx6NJgX

Here's my video. I have nothing to hide.

   1    1
Niccolo Machiavelli
Niccolo Machiavelli 9 months ago

bannedforhatespeech says, "Everyone I don't like is a JEW!!!"

Fucking retard.

   1    2
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Niccolo Machiavelli: you are a jew. our conversation proved you are either a jew or a jew lover. it makes no difference either way. a real white nationalist wouldn't approve of race mixing like you do.

   4    0
Niccolo Machiavelli
Niccolo Machiavelli 9 months ago

I have a question for those who come to this comment section. What are the chances that there are actually jew subversives on this website that gets maybe 200 regular daily visits? 200... Now, what are the chances that @GeneralForrest, @Drumbum, @bannedforhatespeech, and @SmackUrApocolips are low IQ pissants who cannot discern the difference between a White Nationalist and a Jew?

I think we can see who is sucking the dreidel here. You guys are pathetic.

   2    2
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Niccolo Machiavelli: you are no white nationalist. fuck off you filthy kike race mixing mongrel.

   4    0
Show more

Up next