Soviet first moon landing / hoax

138 Views
Balkanfight3r
235
Published on 13 Nov 2021 / In Hoaxes / False Flags

.

Show more
2 Comments sort Sort By

Europeanflower
Europeanflower 9 months ago

Since the module was there to take images, did it put the cameras on the moon before or after they left the moon.

   3    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

We all know America was the only country to ever touch the moon.

   0    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Schutzstaffel: I used to question the moon landing. But since the people telling me that it’s fake were being rude assholes to me because I don’t see any evidence that the Earth is flat. I realized I was duped and now I believe in the moon landing again. Believing the moon landing doesn’t contradict the Bible. The firmament is the atmosphere.

   0    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Schutzstaffel: why should I believe people who insult me? It wasn’t like it was one person, it’s a bit of a trend for flat earthers to do that. They always show some bs math on why they think that, but their math makes absolutely no sense. Also I know for a fact that the Earth doesn’t have an edge because literally no one has ever claimed to have ever seen it. No crazy person that wants attention, no pilots or sailors that talk about it, and there aren’t even any stories about people who have been to the edge. There are literally no witnesses whatsoever. This would have to be the biggest kept secret in the entire history of the world, but there is literally nothing stopping people from going over there to confirm their theory. It’s the most ridiculous thing that I’ve ever heard.

   0    0
SirDigbyChickenCesar
SirDigbyChickenCesar 9 months ago

@bannedforhatespeech: Maybe you shouldn't believe anyone, Maybe start with something simple like, how is it that the video shows some sort of "spacecraft," allegedly in the "vacuum of space," with none of the gases required for combustion on Earth, specifically oxygen, and yet here it is shooting a burning flame out of the bottom of the "spacecraft"?

How is the combustion possible in the absence of oxygen or any of the vaporized gases found on earth?

How is that burning flame not being sucked out into the "vacuum of space"?

What is that burning flame pushing off of if space is a vacuum completely devoid of the vaporized gases found on earth?

   2    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Sir_Digby_Chicken_Cesar: space isn’t completely devoid of oxygen. Just not enough for a normal person to breathe in. But there is clearly enough for rocket fuel to burn.

   0    0
bannedforhatespeech
bannedforhatespeech 9 months ago

@Schutzstaffel: I brought up the stupidity of the flat Earth because the people that believe the moon landing was a hoax usually believe the Earth is flat. I do not view any of them as credible sources of information.

   0    0
SirDigbyChickenCesar
SirDigbyChickenCesar 9 months ago

@bannedforhatespeech:
Effective Oxygen % is 20.9 % at Sea Level
Effective Oxygen % is 6.9 % at Mt. Everest (29,029 ft)

At Mt. Everest Kerosene will not burn and helicopters cannot fly.

The higher you go above sea level, the less oxygen there is in the air.

The highest elevation that trees can live at is 15,000 feet.

If there is such a thing as "space" which NASA claims, the reason there is NO oxygen in space is because there is no plant life in space.

   1    0
Show more