close

I am Gravely Disappointed in the powers that be in Beijing, Your Country was compromised by a certain Tribe many decades ago and now you are just a Vassal State for that very Tribe, Whether you wish to admit it or not. However, I will not stand for your communist propaganda here at WTV and will Terminate With Extreme Prejudice as soon as I acquire your trolls here promoting communist propaganda...As Per This Evenings Terminations, Danke

THE JEWISH "BANK OF ENGLAND" CRIMINAL SYNDICATE

79 Views
LouisMarschalko
227
Published on 08 Sep 2022 / In Money / Banking / Federal Reserve

⁣A campaign for exploiting this division and fanning hatreds between the Christian communities was soon in process of organization. How well the Jews succeeded in this campaign in Britain may be judged from the fact that one of the earliest acts of 'their creature and hireling' Oliver Cromwell, after executing the King according to plan, was to allow the Jews free access to England once more. .... P11
https://ia803405.us.archive.or....g/17/items/the-namel

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
4 Comments sort Sort By

chucky8787
chucky8787 3 days ago

I guess in this video The Money Changers is code word for Jewish.

Ok course I hear the narrator Bill Still is a Jew so of course they would be money changers.

   0    0
dino
dino 18 days ago

The jews learned these banking skills in the Netherlands, where they had settled after having been expelled from Spain in 1492. In 1602 they managed to set up the first joint stock company in the world, the VOC, which was the Dutch version of the East India Company (Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie). The first central bank in the world followed in 1609, the Amsterdamsche Wisselbank. Adam Smith describes how the jews started to figure out that the receipts they were handing out for holding on to customers' gold coins and bullion were treated as if they were as good as the gold itself. They only had one problem: the Amsterdam magistrates insisted on annual audits of their reserves. I believe that this might be one of the chief reasons that the jews chose to move their operations to London.

   1    0
LouisMarschalko
LouisMarschalko 17 days ago

And before:
Such is the history of the Spanish and Portuguese World Empires. Spanish and Portuguese sailors and soldiers fought for the possession of lands where Jews later implanted their trade. Thus did Portugal have the monopoly of Oriental trade from 1500 to 1600.When the arrogance of Jews who, along with wealth, had gainedpolitical power in the Iberian peninsula became unbearable, and when their undermining of the Christian faith and traditions of those two
countries led to the Inquisition and their subsequent expulsion, the Netherlands, having an efficient Navy, were elected to replace the Portuguese. The Dutch were easily inflamed with the idea of creating a great Netherland Empire. Just as the Spaniards and Portuguese had done, they supplied soldiers, sailors and ships between 1603 and 1640; they drove out the
Portuguese from alI their positions at Goa, in the East Indies, Ceylon and Java — Jewish trade went on unhampered under the new nominal owners, but it was diverted to Amsterdam and Antwerp.
https://ia801200.us.archive.or....g/22/items/FryLeslie

   0    0
LouisMarschalko
LouisMarschalko 17 days ago

The development of England’s sea power and spirit of enterprise under Queen Elizabeth, the foundation of the Company of “the Governor and Merchants of London trading in the East Indies” in 1600 coincided with the Dutch expansion and made Britain loom as a possible formidable rival. As Jews were not then openly admitted into England it meant that the independent British trade, if allowed to develop unchecked might shatter Jewish monopoly.Ceaseless efforts were therefore made to obtain the repeal of the laws of expulsion and, as is known, they were crowned with success when
Cromwell granted the petition for their return, presented to him by Manasseh ben Israel in 1655. This same “Protector” of Jews remained insensible to the anger displayed by English merchants when they learned of his concessions to the “returning” aliens.P6 ............ Jews and the British Empire 1935 by L Fry.
https://ia801200.us.archive.or....g/22/items/FryLeslie

   1    0
dino
dino 17 days ago

@LouisMarschalko: thanks for the link; this seems like an interesting read!

   0    0
LouisMarschalko
LouisMarschalko 19 days ago

Montagu Norman, Governor of the Bank of England, came to Washington on February 6, 1929, to confer with Andrew Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury. On November 11, 1927, the Wall Street Journal described Mr. Norman as “the currency dictator of Europe.” Professor Carroll Quigley notes that Norman, a close confidant of J. P. Morgan, admitted: “I hold the hegemony of the world.” Immediately after this mysterious visit, the Federal Reserve Board reversed its easy-money policy and began raising the discount rate. The balloon which had been inflated constantly for nearly seven years was about to be exploded.
On October 24 [1929], the feathers hit the fan. Writing in “The United States’ Unresolved Monetary and Political Problems”, William Bryan describes what happened:
“When everything was ready, the New York financiers started calling 24 hour broker call loans. This meant that the stockbrokers and the customers had to dump their stock on the market in order to pay the loans. This naturally collapsed the stock market and brought a banking collapse all over the country because the banks not owned by the oligarchy were heavily involved in broker call claims at this time, and bank runs soon exhausted their coin and currency and they had to close. The Federal Reserve System would not come to their aid, although they were instructed under the law to maintain an elastic currency.”
The investing public, including most stock brokers and bankers, took a horrendous blow in the crash, but not the insiders. They were either out of the market or had sold “short” so that they made enormous profits as the Dow Jones plummeted. For those who knew the score, a comment by Paul Warburg had provided the warning to sell. That signal came on March 9, 1929, when the Financial Chronical quoted Warburg as giving this sound advice:
“If orgies of unrestricted speculation are permitted to spread too far the ultimate collapse is certain … to bring about a general depression involving the whole country.”
Sharpies were later able to buy back these stocks at a ninety percent discount from their former highs.
https://21stcenturycicero.word....press.com/2008/02/11

   0    0
Show more