close

As advertised a few months back I have created a new website for more of a Free Speech Atmosphere, I will no longer allow FE Theory at WT.Online but will at Truth In The World Dot Com, I will not allow FE here as per the last few months and doubt that I ever will, I Loathe it mainly because of all the infighting it brings and a certain tribe is laughing at us because of it, Meanwhile they are up to the usual tricks while we squabble over something with Zero Relevance, Danke

Up next


The Science Behind How 5G Will Fuck Us All Up Must Watch

259 Views
Published on 19 Feb 2022 / In Uncategorized

mirrored from Brighteon
Note: Vtamin C and abscorbic acid are not the same thing.

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
5 Comments sort Sort By

PaperHearts
PaperHearts 8 months ago

What is the state of 5G in Israel?

   1    0
TheRealmcGoy1
TheRealmcGoy1 8 months ago

This is all i could find .
Seems like they want to kill my people first .
Am from the Netherlands .

   1    0
PaperHearts
PaperHearts 8 months ago

@TheRealmcGoy1: holy shit that is a high concentration around the Netherlands! Thanks for the info.

   1    0
TheRealmcGoy1
TheRealmcGoy1 8 months ago

This aint the future ... unless you like to die .

   2    0
TheRealmcGoy1
TheRealmcGoy1 8 months ago

Fire works much much better against this radiation .

   2    0
AppalachianAmerican
AppalachianAmerican 8 months ago

As the highest class licensed Amateur Extra Radio Operator I find this video a bit hyperbolic.

Yes, there are valid concerns as well as the risk assessment has been overdue for decades, but as long as you are not in the line-of-site between tower-to-tower propagation you have little grave risk or health hazards.

The inverse square law states that the power is a direct inverse relationship to the square of the distance.
At two wavelengths away from the source, the power is reduced by 75% to only 25% of its initial intensity , at three wavelengths it drops to 11%, then 6.5%, and so on. A 6GHz wavelength is 1" inch. At three inches distance away, the non-ionizing radiation level drops by 89%...and so on.

Received signals are tiny-faint in comparison measured in micro Watts and nano Watts. (as little as 1/250,000th of 1 Watt.)

With that said, I suggest keeping your phone away from your head as much as possible, and your home away from high power lines. Your cell phone is transmitting about 0.5 to 2 watts Effective Radiated Power.

The observed phenomena is tissue heating though it would take much more than a cell phone. The battery would get hot and burn you before any radio waves.
(Think "100,00 Watt 4GHz Active Denial System.")

There is also "some" fairly compelling evidence of animals & plants being affected by high power line-of-site transmissions. The FCC hasn't done a complete study for over 35 years.

IMHO
The real and present danger is not 5G cell phone radiation, it's the 5G bandwidth that allows for a 24/7 panopticon of government surveillance and social credit scoring system.

The 'dumbing down' of America long preceded 5G.

   4    0
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 7 months ago

@AppalachianAmerican Okay, well I will ask you to look at this Pittsfield, MA board of Health has issued a cease and dessist letter to Verizon (owns 5g towers in area), because after it was turned on, people began feeling sick. For many residents, it was impossible to remain in their homes. They ened up leaving the town, sleeping in their cars or at a friends house out of town. Some became very sick. https://ehtrust.org/pittsfield....-ma-board-of-health-

   0    0
pastprovespresent
pastprovespresent 7 months ago

And this case too After the installation of 4g, 250 meters from a farm 32 cows have died within 6 months. https://www.zoomdici.fr/actual....ite/la-justice-sembo

   0    0
AppalachianAmerican
AppalachianAmerican 7 months ago

@pastprovespresent: -yet miraculously, somehow only the 1000lb. cows were affected and the 150lb. people are fine. -???
Correlation does not always equal causation...but I agree we need more real world data & study.

Again, it's not the presence of radiowaves that cause harm, it's the intensity.
Taking an X-ray radiograph is a health trade-off, and thousands of times more intense -much riskier because x-rays are onizing...they will disrupt electrons at a cellular level.

What is the real-world difference from 2.4GHz to 29GHz? - seeing how there is much natural phenomena & radiation bombarding us everyday with greater intensity?

Right now there is WiFi, Q-100 hit radio, channel 5 news, and the vast arrays of modern wireless radio telecommunications bombarding you 24/7.

Industrial accidents, bad foresight, mishaps, mistakes, etc. do happen.
Yes without deep & lengthy studies nothing should be discounted, but if you hang your hat on "well, it's much higher frequencies causing the harm" - then what about nanometer radiowaves we call visible light?

Be cautious, keep your awareness on a swivel, and don't freak out...just yet. - Cheers.

   0    0
Canuck Down Under
Canuck Down Under 8 months ago

Man's rebellion against The Creator will fail.

   2    0
Show more

Up next