Up next


The Teachings of Christ Jesus

54 Views
Ou✟cas✟
103
Published on 28 Jun 2021 / In Bible / Sermons

Let he who has eyes to see, see, and he who has ears, hear.

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
2 Comments sort Sort By

mognaporda
mognaporda 1 year ago

Intelligent men would not accept the teachings of JEWsus.

   0    0
Ou✟cas✟
Ou✟cas✟ 1 year ago

See, now you're showing your true (((colors))) and/or your ignorance.

Jesus was not, and is not a "jew". Period. This is a fact, facts are not up for debate. But if you're not a jew yourself and you're humble enough to allow yourself to be taught by someone more learned than you, then I'd be happy to educate you.

   3    0
mognaporda
mognaporda 1 year ago

@Ou✟cas✟ :
Circumcising infants on the 8th day after their birth in a TYPICAL JEWISH ceremony is a pure Jewish act.
And JEWsus underwent that.

The ancestors of Europeans never had the disgusting tradition of mutilating the genital, even in your own (((Bible))), the Indo-European Philistines did not have this disgusting tradition.

   0    0
Ou✟cas✟
Ou✟cas✟ 1 year ago

@mognaporda: Philistines were hybrid abominations that jews today descend from, you stupid satanic (((bastard))). You're one of them. Your rotten (((fruit))) proves it. Their toxic blood runs in your veins. That's why you spread their lies. Whether you're self aware or not, it doesn't matter. You are a satan's bitch.

"Indo-European", smh... They were shitskin giants, and you worship them, because they're your ancestors, you (((freak))).

   2    0
mognaporda
mognaporda 1 year ago

@Ou✟cas✟ :
Someone got triggered.
Philistines spoke an Indo-European dialect, the DNA studies reveal Philistines were Indo-European.

   0    0
Ou✟cas✟
Ou✟cas✟ 1 year ago

@mognaporda: Dna (((studies))) from (((who)))? That's what I thought.

   2    0
Techno Viking
Techno Viking 1 year ago

@mognaporda: I WAS TOLD IT WAS JESUS
Among the various rumors that came to my ears there was one in particular that attracted my attention. A young man, it was said, appeared in Galiee preaching with a noble unction a new law in the name of God who had sent him. At first I was apprehensive that his design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled. Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day in passing by the place of Siloe, where

there was a great concourse of people, I observed in the midst of the group a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected, so great was the difference between him and those listening to him. His golden-colored hair and beard gave him the appearance of a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about thirty years old. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a Contrast between him and his hearers, with their black beards and tawny completion!

   3    0
Charles Fockaert
Charles Fockaert 1 year ago

@mognaporda: http://www.cirp.org/library/history/peron2/

CIRCUMCISION: THEN AND NOW

By: James E. Peron, Ed.D.
Milah: Symbolic Circumcision of Covenant
The original Biblical circumcision of Abraham's time was a relatively minor ritual circumcision procedure in which only the redundant end of the foreskin extending beyond the tip of the glans was removed. This was called "Milah". It is from this term that the Jewish Religious Covenant circumcision ritual Bris Milah or Brith Milah got its name.

Following "Milah", a penis so circumcised would still contain a considerable portion of the foreskin and the penis would have continued to go through its natural development since most of the foreskin would have remained intact. Protection of the glans would still have occurred. The foreskin would not be stripped back off the glans and would naturally separate from the glans gradually as the child matures, much as it would had the child not been circumcised.

The sensitive frenulum would not have been disturbed or moved, and the foreskin remaining would continue to cover and protect a substantial portion of the glans, especially when flaccid, and the glans would appear as uncircumcised. There would be minimal loss of sensitivity or intended protection.

This type circumcision continued throughout the ages and during the time of Christ. The circumcision of Christ would have been this type circumcision as referred to in the bible. Indeed, biblical reference to circumcision is strictly this form of circumcision. It continued into the New Testament. It has been argued that Michelangelo's David should show David as Circumcised.

Interestingly, Michelangelo presented David precisely as he should have appeared following an infant "Milah" circumcision. His glans is essentially covered with only the tip of the glans showing.

In short, you don't know what you are talking about. big surprise.

   1    0
Charles Fockaert
Charles Fockaert 1 year ago

@mognaporda: Yahshua was no more an Esau Edomite jew,
than you are an intelligent man.

   1    0
Ou✟cas✟
Ou✟cas✟ 1 year ago

@Charles Fockaert: REKT! 🤣💪🏻

   0    0
mics972
mics972 1 year ago

We are at the end of times; Book of Revelation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iL0BujGA3Eg

   1    0
Show more

Up next