close

As advertised a few months back I have created a new website for more of a Free Speech Atmosphere, I will no longer allow FE Theory at WT.Online but will at Truth In The World Dot Com, I will not allow FE here as per the last few months and doubt that I ever will, I Loathe it mainly because of all the infighting it brings and a certain tribe is laughing at us because of it, Meanwhile they are up to the usual tricks while we squabble over something with Zero Relevance, Danke

Up next


World Trade Center Building 7 - Sound Evidence For Explosions

150 Views
DavilleKy
9
Published on 10 Apr 2021 / In 911

⁣There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues. This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.

Show more
We need your support. Contribute today. Together we are stronger. Danke. #1488
2 Comments sort Sort By

AppalachianAmerican
AppalachianAmerican 3 months ago

How ironic...the sound is missing. lol
Anyway, it's good I came here so I could block Dan TheJewacle.

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

LOL sound is borked.... worthless upload.

   0    1
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago (edited)

You can't ignore witnesses hearing the explosions as the building fell which is clearly backed up by the audio. University of Alaska Fairbanks already proved the building didn't collapse from fire. That only leaves one option that did.

   0    1
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: take both your hands, palms facing towards each other about a foot apart then as rapidly as you can move your palms towards each other, now picture that on hundreds of square meters at once. furethermore find me even a single piece of evidence of ANY explosions or windows being blown out BEFORE the building is already falling under its own weight? pro tip: there isnt even a single evidence for a single explosion before the buildings are already moving, once they started to move on their own there was NOTHING that was going to stop it but the ground... also your alaska study was debunked the day it came out, its utter bullshit paid for by conspiracy theorists ti cover up for the jews who were involved in 9/11....

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: New WTC 7 Alaska study Debunked by Ryan Dawson https://worldtruthvideos.org/w....atch/new-wtc-7-alask

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: WTC7 on 9/11, what really happened? [remastered] https://worldtruthvideos.org/w....atch/wtc7-on-9-11-wh

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@Dan TheOracle: On 9/11, WTC7 Collapse Was Firemen's Concern (controlled demolition debunked) https://worldtruthvideos.org/w....atch/on-9-11-wtc7-co

   0    0
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago

@Dan TheOracle: Ryan Dawson lol

   0    1
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago (edited)

Get the BS outta here shill. Did you learn Physics in high school? Are you familiar with the Laws of Physics? Why wont NIST release their computer model for the collapse of Building 7? Do you have any proof that these fires in all 3 buildings reached the temperature to weaken steel?

   0    1
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: it only takes about 380c for structural steel to begin to weaken, taken just from the first google search result fires tend to burn between 500-1000c minimum https://www.target-fire.co.uk/....resource-centre/what

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: it was well known that all 3 towers were susceptible to fire damage because they all not only had millions of dollars worth of fire proofing to the bottom side of the floor structures but it was also not up to code and was going to cost more than the towers were worth to bring them up to code, this is the whole reason "lucky larry" was sold them for "a steal" anyway. the only way of fixing the issue was to bring the buildings down piece by piece the same way they went up because demolition was obviously far too dangerous as we saw on 9/11 with how much other damage was done to wtc6 and 7 from wtc1 falling on them. we also know wtc7 burnt for 7 hours and the fireproofing was only designed to last 2 hours which would have been the typical time for fire fighters to have address the fire but because the twin towers falling was what started the fires in 7 in the first place and already taken out the water mains there was no point in even trying to save 7 as my videos quite simply point out...

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: and you call me the shill for pointing out your jewish conspiracies that you have absolutely zero proof for where as my side i have all the evidence presented... ok jew...

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

For the undying 9/11 MORONIC JET FUEL ARGUMENT https://worldtruthvideos.org/w....atch/for-the-undying

   0    0
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago (edited)

@Dan TheOracle: There is no proof for the temps to weaken steel. NIST who did the official report on the collapse reported the highest temperature was 480°F. They refuse to show their computer model for the collapse because they know its BS.

   0    0
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago

Firefighter Orio Palmer made it to the 78th floor and reported two isolated pockets of fire should be able to put it out with two lines. Really doesn't sound like the raging out of control fire they claim caused the collapse. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbA2Qntis6M

   0    0
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago (edited)

So if building 7 collapsed from fire its the first steel framed building in history to do so. That means every steel building in the world is at risk for collapse if it catches fire, but yet they're still building them to the same code. It also fell at free fall speed, and that's admitted by NIST. So to fall at free fall speed, to do that violates the Laws of PHYSICS. The only way to do that and fall perfectly symmetrical like it did means every column had to be removed at the same time. This is basic high school physics.

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: "Firefighter Orio Palmer made it to the 78th floor and reported two isolated pockets of fire" show me evidence for a fire that burns downwards? this is dumber than flat earth theory... of course on that mostly undamaged floor had little problems.... jesus you are fucking dumb or are you just a known liar?

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: "NIST who did the official report on the collapse reported the highest temperature was 480°F" if you are just going to lie dont give your sources you lying fucking retard... https://www.nist.gov/topics/di....saster-failure-studi

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: "It also fell at free fall speed" no it didnt you fucking liar... it took 7 hours odd to fall. 200m tall towers do not take 7 hours to fall if they are falling at freefall speed.

   0    0
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

"The only way to do that and fall perfectly symmetrical like it did" except it didnt, just more jew fucking lies...

   0    0
DavilleKy
DavilleKy 1 year ago

@Dan TheOracle: NIST said it did . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iGMvnwjUizY

   0    1
Dan TheOracle
Dan TheOracle 1 year ago

@DavilleKy: thats just what knowing liars say about what nist say, frankly i dont even care what nist say. the fact is that wtc7 was first hit and damaged at around 10am which was also when the fires started and finally ended at around 530pm.... thats around 7 hours from when it was first hit to when its destruction finally ended in total collapse. from the video i posted about what really happened to wtc7 which you either didnt watch or you are too fucking dumb to see the obvious it clearly shows the penthouse collapse before the outer shell finally gives way. you are just full of shit just as the video you just posted is.

   0    0
Show more

Up next